atheistthoughts wrote:Then God is an idiot. Memory is just about the worst thing to trust for information. False memories can be created in less than a month. I have seen this myself. A friend and I had a dissagreement on how many books he lent me, I said one and he said two. I knew I was right because I looked at my bookshelf and saw I didn't have it (this was over MSN messenger) and he thought I was insane for not remembering that he lent me that book. I asked him to check his bookshelf and, lo and behold, it was there. It was clear he would've bet money on that false memory. If god depended on memory to record important history that everybody's eternal salvation depends on, I would say he's evil. When he could've made it clear, he chose to make it ambiguous and have more people end up in hell.
Then who is the idiot, you or your friend?
Neither!
Because there was 4 people with their memory of their account of the history of the events in the NT. If all 4 spoke of the same accounts then your current argument would be that they all conspired with what they said and it would still be lies.
Either way you wouldn't believe none of the accounts of the 4!
It's called FAITH for a reason!