TO: ALL
Consider this:
1. The prevailing old universe model appears to be only perhaps testable and not truly testable as can be seen in my prior post.
2. The science journals citations I cited in my original post are not exactly cheerful when it comes to old universe explanations of planet formation, stars, and solar systems. I am betting they are cheerier descriptions of Soviet gulags than what I cited in my initial post. Perhaps my initial post could be called the Bataan death march of old universe planetary, sun and solar system explanations.
3. The young earth creationist astronomy model is less speculative when it comes to how they see 90% of the universe. In short, we have tried to weigh the alleged "dark matter" and found it wanting.
4. The young earth creationist astronomy material is very compelling!
I recommended these links for creationist astronomy:
http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebo ... ences.html
http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/ar ... ronomy.asp
5. It appears hundreds of scientists have signed on to the Big Bang public protest made prominent by the science journal New Scientist (see: http://www.jesus-christ-forums.com/home/viewtopic.php?t=6964 ).
6. The big bang theory also has a light-travel–time problem. It is called the horizon problem (see: Lightman, A., Ancient Light, Harvard University Press, London, p. 58, 1991 Also, Newton, R., Light-travel time: a problem for the 'big bang', Creation 25(4): 48–49, 2003.
). So some Big Bangers can stop taunting creationist regarding how we can see starlight!
7. The creationists have a exciting new peer reviewed cosmological model which offers and explanation for how we see starlight (
D.R. Humphreys, It’s Just a Matter of Time, Creation Research Society Quarterly, 34(1):32–34, 1997 ).
8. The young earth creationist astronomy is perhaps testable. All the old universe people have to do is come up with reliable and unimpeachable old earth dating methodologies to be used on earth.