With all due respect you have put your faith in science, which has yet to prove anything concerning the origins or age of the universe.
and reject the rational discoveries of science which are based on verifiable, observable and measurable data. Your ignorance is truly staggering for someone living in the 21st Century. No doubt you also believe that the Sun revolves around the flat Earth, because that is just as insane. From your words, it is clear you have no scientific education or understanding. In fact, if scientific advancement had been left to people like you, we would still be sitting in caves dressed in animal skins and rubbing sticks together to try to make fire.
If anyone has demonstrated ignorance on this forum it is you. The ancients
did not believe the earth was flat. See this thread:
four corners of the Earth elaborated (round Earth)
You like most materialists have put your faith in science, which dictates constants so its nice rational formulae will work. So before you call us ignorant and superstitious may I suggest you do some in depth research instead of blindly putting your faith in man.
Why not start with this:
History of the Research of the Speed of Light
Preface:
The following paper was started by Barry Setterfield in 1987. Shortly after the data and rough paper were complete, he was asked by a senior research scientist at Stanford Research Institute International to put together a white paper for internal study. This paper was done with Trevor Norman, then of Flinders University in Adelaide Australia. The paper was published by Flinders University due to internal reorganization at SRI at that time. Gerald Aardsma, then of Creation Research Institute in southern California, then telephoned both SRI and Flinders and asked them if they knew that Setterfield was a young earth creationist. This information caused both Flinders and SRI to retract support for the paper, although the Flinders staff had, before that telephone call, been interested enough in the paper to ask for a seminar hosted by Setterfield and Norman regarding the subject of the speed of light and the statistical analysis. The seminar was cancelled, Setterfield was told he was unwelcome on the campus from that time on, Norman was instructed not to have anything further to do with Setterfield if he wanted to keep his job at the university. Norman later resigned his position. The paper, however, had been published and is available on the web here:
http://www.setterfield.org/report/report.html
Real science questions its theories, especially when observable and measurable data has been ignored because of the egos of men whose reputations are at stake.