Aineo wrote:
John 1:1 has been used by non-Christians and cults for centuries in an attempt to show that the Word was divine and not God. This is based on a lack of knowledge concerning Greek grammar and the use of the definite article "ho". In other words Abdallah, the debate over John 1:1 is nothing more than a word game since in Greek grammar the fact "ho" is missing before the word "theos" in a subordinate clause does not change the identification of the Word as being "ho theos" or the God.
Check out the Cult forum and you will find a lot of threads dealing with oneness theology as well as other cults who deny the diety of Jesus. This is nothing new
Abdalla answered:
Sorry but that answer is laughable..
See the scholarly big article again...read it carefully..
Kai replies:
Ok Abdalla since you are the great scholar in Greek grammar you tell us why John 1: 1 does not confirm the divinity of Christ?
And don't bother just referring to a website, for once sake present yourself as a person with integrity and post some arguments from your own assessment.