Science, Creation & EvolutionNon young creation astronomy failedTuppence was made a moderator of a forum because tuppence is both fair and knows how to communicate with those with less education than she has, which cannot be said for you. Also tuppence went out of her way to seperated evolution from old/young age advocates in her post because she understands that come extremely qualified Christian scientists accept an old universe while rejecting evolution. [/quote]As to the above, I notice you did not address what Paul wrote. Do I need to explain what Paul had to say about how to discuss issues with different groups? Logic can and is used (since you quoted tuppence she is a great example) without using terms that are found in textbooks and need to be defined by pride filled people who are so filled with their pride they lord it over the less educated. As to logic, in pure form logic is mathematics; 1 + 1 = 2. However evolutionary biologists can use the same tactics based on what they have been taught and believe. As to your list of nine reasons why "day" in Genesis must be accepted as how we understand 24 hour days your source is biased toward your beliefs. Take a long look at reason #5. God created the sun and the moon on the fourth day so what was the source of light for the three days since God created light on day one? Also night did not exist until the fourth "day" therefore there could not possibly have been "day" and "night" as we understand the terms today. Now Christianonnet this is a science forum where science not the Bible is discussed. When you can show where science and the Bible agree then you can quote Scripture and show that the Bible is accurate. If you have any scientific evidence to show that "day" and "night" can be attributed to the Biblical days of creation trot it out otherwise your posts are off topic and subject to deletion. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame