I am not referring in to evolution from family to order. Every example used by evolutionists to prove evolution are at the species level.
Ok, i just gave you a few pages back an example of evolution at the level of family. That is not the level of species. Stop saying this. I already gave you an example, you simply ignore it.
Since you used dogs as an example all domesticated dogs fall under one species, however, dogs can interbreed with wolves, which is another species within the same genus but cannot interbreed with cats. Dogs and cats are in the same order.
Ok, I am not seeing your point. Dogs and wolves are a different species. Fine. now explain how the example, which i quote yet again, is at a species level:
Boraas (1983) reported the induction of multicellularity in a strain of Chlorella pyrenoidosa (since reclassified as C. vulgaris) by predation. He was growing the unicellular green alga in the first stage of a two stage continuous culture system as for food for a flagellate predator, Ochromonas sp., that was growing in the second stage. Due to the failure of a pump, flagellates washed back into the first stage. Within five days a colonial form of the Chlorella appeared. It rapidly came to dominate the culture. The colony size ranged from 4 cells to 32 cells. Eventually it stabilized at 8 cells. This colonial form has persisted in culture for about a decade. The new form has been keyed out using a number of algal taxonomic keys. They key out now as being in the genus Coelosphaerium, which is in a different family from Chlorella.
Note the emphasis I added, this is change in family, not species. Family is, by your own citing, a much broader taxonomical class than species. Stop saying that this change is only at a species level. The quote clearly shows the change is in family.
Every example used by evolutionists to prove evolution are at the species level.
I just proved how this statement is incorrect.