hisway wrote: Again you have missed the point. The "tongues" Paul referred to "not all speak in tongues" was the Gift of Tongues and not the Sign of Spirit baptism. You don't even believe in the name of Jesus how could I expect you to believe in any truth? Why do you even profess Christianity?
hisway wrote:Just as the sign of Spirit baptism is speaking in tongues so is water baptism in Jesus' name the sign of the circumcision made without hands. God has used signs throughout the Scriptures. In my study of the subject of the significance of the sign of "circumcision" in the O.T. and how that sign is applied to the N.T. I found it definitely corresponded to water baptism. Therefore, if the circumcision of the O.T. is a "type" that refers to water baptism in the N.T. then the significance of that "type" as it was in the O.T. must carry over in principle to the N.T. application. The O.T. circumcision served as the enrty point to participate in the Old Covenant as water baptism must also serve as an entry point into the New Covenant.
See the Problem here hisway?
You can rack your brain as much as you like, your only deceiving yourself!