Your husband starts one page with "God does not lie", Tuppence.
Humans didn't just 'appear' out of nowhere, unless 'god' is incorporated into the theory. And god cannot be proved, so any scientific theory that needs god(s) to make sense is a dubious one at best.
And IF the timeline is correct, the burden of proof is still yours to explain this 'god' that clicked his fingers and magically made the world and all animals in its present form. I have never seen any evidence that this god you and your husband speak of exists.
Creation scientists in general seem to say: "Well, we haven't got any proof, but let's assume god exists and base all sorts of wild theories on that."
What they really should be doing is proof that god exists. Once you have done that, you'll see that people will start taking Creationism serious.
Evidence for evolution is unearthed daily, but proof for god seems to be completely lacking. I might as well say the Easter Bunny created the world in 6 days. Granted, I have no evidence to support that idea, but that doesn't stop me from basing theories on that. You see where I'm going?
Perhaps I should do as your husband did and start up my own internet site with theories about the universe. I think I know a good opening sentence already: "The Easter Bunny doesn't lie."