ArchivedChristadelphianismNo. I said I'd answer it when I got from you whether you believed in Original sin, and there's a very good reason as you are about to see. On the contrary, I'm sticking to the point. And on that point, you have still failed to answer my posts. OK. You finally answered the question. I'll take it that you do believe in the doctrine of Original Sin. That's what I needed to know. OK, read carefully, and try not to get a wrong idea here: Firstly, your idea of what "sinful nature" means is different to ours, because when you say "sinful nature" you mean "a nature that bears Original Sin" Your problem is that you think that we mean this when we say "sinful nature" and therefore, you think that we are calling Jesus a sinner. We have a different view: When we say "sinful nature" we mean a nature capable of sin. We believe that Jesus was capable of sin, or he could not have been tempted. We believe what the Bible says, that Jesus was "made of a woman, made under the Law", and that he was "made like his brethren in every way". As I've already pointed out, we do not believe that Jesus committed any sin. In a couple of sentences, it can be summed up like this, we believe:
Go back and read my post again, because you have not understood my answer here. Actually we have had our debates with carm and we were left waiting for Matt Slick to respond to us, as he has also avoided addressing the fact that he has misunderstood certain of our beliefs. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame