Science, Creation & EvolutionCains loverToo bad. Maybe you should. It states some very disturbing misconceptions of genetics (namely: sins are responsible for causing genetic defects in inbreading). It is yet another example of an intricate story, JUST to proof that a section of the bible is true. I find it equally disturbing that everyone seems to blindly accept these theories about inbreading, and can get away with sentences like 'Unfortunately, genes today contain many mistakes (because of sin and the Curse)'. Click here to sea it in the original context "Science and Bible agree" is a very general conclusion to your text! Yes, christians believe in a single continent, and science has proven that the continents were unitied once. This is where the comparison stops! "During the Triassic period (about 248-208 million years ago), the first phase of the Mesozoic Era, all lands formed one supercontinent known as Pangeae ("all earth"). The northern parth is called Laurasia, the southern Gondwana." source This is what science holds true. According to the bible, the supercontinent existed as little as 6000 years ago! About the vapor canopy, read this: "Vapor canopy. This model, proposed by Whitcomb & Morris and others, proposes that much of the Flood water was suspended overhead until the 40 days of rain which caused the Flood. The following objections are covered in more detail by Brown. * How was the water suspended, and what caused it to fall all at once when it did? * If a canopy holding the equivalent to more than 40 feet of water were part of the atmosphere, it would raise the atmospheric pressure accordingly, raising oxygen and nitrogen levels to toxic levels. * If the canopy began as vapor, any water from it would be superheated. This scenario essentially starts with most of the Flood waters boiled off. Noah and company would be poached. If the water began as ice in orbit, the gravitational potential energy would likewise raise the temperature past boiling. * A canopy of any significant thickness would have blocked a great deal of light, lowering the temperature of the earth greatly before the Flood. * Any water above the ozone layer would not be shielded from ultraviolet light, and the light would break apart the water molecules." SOURCE You can also read on this page what is wrong with the hydro-plate theory. /points to above text Then let's not discuss the deluge or Noah in this thread anymore. Let's focus on the text that 'explains' how the human population could have grown from two people. (Does anyone else find it strange that Adam and Eve could grow very old? 800 years or older... O right, god had given them 'perfect genes', whatever that means. It is not explained WHAT perect means when it comes to genes) Will he be wearing special super shoes, that split mountains? I am not impressed by numerology. I don't believe that comparing numbers and dates is a valid argument. It does not proof anything now does it? Furthermore, Adam was a fictional character in a story. There was no 'first man' with 'perfect genes' (perfect, yet he sinned?) and no one has ever reached the age of 800. It quite amusing, if not a bit unsettling, that people that express such great knowedge and intellect do not dare to look at biblical stories from a more critical point of view. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame