If there is a 'mountain' of evidence, why is it that every single debate I've ever seen between an evolutionist and a creationist has been a landslide victory for the creationist?
I was at a debate just a few months ago. Kent Hovind vs Dr Shermer. Shermer is author of the book "How To Debate a Creationist". Hovind had a reply for anything Shermer said and Shermer ignored 90% of what Hovind had to say. You can download the debate for yourself from CSE. And I know a lot of people here think Hovind is a goof, but watch the debate before you judge that. Some of the stuff he has to say may not be perfect, but a lot of what he has to say makes sense.