ArchivedDifference of understandingRefutation sites were given from both sides. There are plenty of information in those sites. I see no need to further delve in. I'm confident with the muslim approach because I'm muslim, and you are confident with the christian approach because you are christian. Why should I waste my time when you are not willing to take anything but just set out to refute it. And why are you wasting your time, for the same reason. Exchange of ideas on the issue is already made and no need to continue a fruitless discussion, and as discussion turned out to be a quarrel by you. Another issue is that although this is a place tagged "Qur'an and Bible debate", I think scriptures should be out of question here. I say this because when I ask a question about christian theology, say trinity, there pops out numerous quotations from the Bible. But, Bible is a book I do not accept as authentic. Christians do that to show that what they say is consistent with the Bible, but the question is whether the theology and tenets (of Bible) consistent with human understanding. We should be able to deal with theology from an objective point of view, because giving reference to books does not seem to work as they are not accepted by consecutive sides. Also, you call me blind faithed but arent you christians accepting everthing in the Bible, with no reverence to human logic, and easily rule out questions by saying God's logic is different. It is in fact you who leave little or no room for logic. And finally, I may be writing as if I am preaching but I am certainly sure my posts makes more sense than Bible posts here. I'm sure you'll claim I'm avoiding discussion, because I can't...bla bla... Let it be. This is your place man! Unite |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame