Science, Creation & EvolutionHas there been a good argument against Evolution?Jovaro wrote:I suppose the silence means that there hasn't been anything....
Please note that.
Javaro, please note: The fact that people do not respond in the time you want, does not mean they will not respond, or that there is no answer.
Seeing that you do not adhere to that statement which I just made above as truth, what is the use of disproving evolution to you? If you are not patient enough to wait for answers, why should people give you answers?
If Darwinism is true, why does it contradict the laws of science itself? Instead of giving you a big list, let's go one by one:
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which is accepted as one of the basic laws of physics, holds that under normal conditions all systems left on their own tend to become disordered, dispersed, and corrupted in direct relation to the amount of time that passes......................Evolutionary theory ignores this fundamental law of physics. The mechanism offered by evolution totally contradicts the second law. The theory of evolution says that disordered, dispersed, and lifeless atoms and molecules spontaneously came together over time, in a particular order, to form extremely complex molecules such as proteins, DNA, and RNA, whereupon millions of different living species with even more complex structures gradually emerged. http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/thermodynamics.html
| View Parent Message View dfilename Return Home |