Hi Zombie
Zombie wrote:What proof do you have that those samples of Quran are 100% legit. If you knew how to read Arabic (which you definitely don't) you would notice that those verses are missing some important dots/symbols in various places, it looks to me like they've been faded/removed intentionally. The dots are missing from the words "Rhman" (three times), some of the words are written completely differently then they are usually written in Arabic script. By removing even one dot(arabic symbols) from an Arabic word, you can change the whole meaning of it..... (Shows how much you know about other languages)
DON'T BRING SOMETHING UP IF YOU CAN'T PROVE IT. :evil:
No need to get angry my friend
I'm just presenting a website that claims there are some minor variations in different Qurans. If you don't accept it, fine. But why shouldn't I bring it up? Are you the only one who can bring up things he can't 'prove'? (see below)
I may have been wrong about the location of the orginal manuscripts and I apologize for that and I would like to make a correction.The two copies of the original Mus'hafs sent by Uthman to the provincial centers of the Muslim world are still in existence; one of them in the Topkapi Museum of Istanbul, and another in Tashkent. I hope that you'll find it in you heart to forgive me for that mistake. :roll:
Of course I will forgive you for that mistake
I'm a nice guy
The Quranic revelations started in 589, and any normal intelligent human being would say that thats BEFORE 604. (Shows how much you know about simple math and history)
Mmmmm... 589?
Can you please provide a source for that year?
I keep finding
610 as the year that the revelations started.
Most sources state that Mohammed was probably born in 570.
So you think he was only 19 when the revelations started?
... I thought he was more like 40 ....
Please provide the proof, math and history for the claim you brought up: 589 being the start of the quranic revelations
thanx,
best regards